Followers

Saturday, 27 June 2026

Pedagogy and Tradition in A.'.A.'.

Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law.

Like many aspirants, I started out, not just in the A\A\ but in occultism in general, absorbing the traditional structures and forms of Western Esotericism. For me this really began with early exposure to Wicca, primarily from the Gardnerian tradition, then Paganism more generally and from there into the tarot, then the Golden Dawn system, which led fairly quickly into Thelema.

In such a pipeline it's natural to absorb certain correspondences, systems of symbols and other magickal technology such as astrology, the Tarot, the Hermetic Qabalah, on into the Theology and philosophy of Thelema itself as described by Crowley, and later his successors who sought, with varying degrees of success and originality, to clarify and systematise. Thus, in some circles Thelema has become a fixed thing, a definite system in itself with little room for interpretation, while in others it is looser, given more to personal interpretation, and yet others hold that delicate middle ground between these extremes.

From the perspective of an A\A\ aspirant, a fairly encyclopedic knowledge of these things is more or less expected. By the time I began as a Probationer 0=0 I had already long since learned most of the major correspondences and rituals by heart. Learning from an instructor in the sense of them 'teaching' you the fundamentals and showing you the ropes, simply didn't happen with me, and so I didn’t really think too much about pedagogy and tradition until later on, when as a Neophyte 1=10, I took on my first students. Only then did I begin to understand that absorbing the system is not the same thing as transmitting it.

That was a long time ago now too. Students have come and gone; mostly gone it has to be said. I would not call myself a particularly good teacher, if my students voting with their feet is anything to go by, but I have on the whole tried to balance helping them to understand the A\A\ as a tradition to pass on, and addressing the need for flexibility and adaptation in their own path and practice. This is mainly because I view my role not so much as that of a teacher, but as a witness. I am not there to be anybody’s master, but simply to hold them accountable for their own path and practice. Perhaps I am mistaken and such people require more guidance, in which case they had better find it elsewhere.

The distinguishing feature of the A\A\as a system is the one-to-one nature of the system. An aspirant knows only their supervisor, and any students they may have assigned to them. There are no peers to rely on or compare ourselves to. Our grades matter to nobody outside those already mentioned. To my mind the most important thing for the aspirant is steady progress, not so much in the spiritual sense (since there really is no progress), but in the sense of continuing to learn, grow and develop as initiates.

The path is essentially practical, empirical, and based on seeing what works. That is not to say that existing theory doesn’t matter. It does matter, being musically literate will make you a better musician, just so being magickally literate will make you a better magician. It is for this reason that students are instructed to learn the basic rituals of the Golden Dawn tradition via Liber O and elsewhere, to learn the system of correspondences of the Holy Qabalah, and the columns of names, words, and other things found in Liber 777. These are the building blocks of the Western magickal traditions and they comprise a common language with which to communicate with others, and to create a coherent internal magickal universe. However, as the cliché goes, the map is not the territory, and at some point, we all have to draw our own maps, explore new territory.

On the other hand, the work of the Order is exploratory and empirical. Anyone who spends any time in the A\A\ system will realise that prepackaged occultism is really not what we are about. Not everybody thinks the same way, and while certain patterns exist aspirants will have a more or less individual approach to things like practical magick, ceremony, their approach to mysticism etc. Ability differs too, often due to simple physical limitations. For example, my knees, as I’ve gotten older, don’t let me sit in The Dragon posture for extended periods, so I don’t. Others may find that trance-states are better attained via music or via imagery and colour, or by movement, and this will also influence the nature and expression of any 'results' they might obtain, and methods organising energy, of ‘energised enthusiasm’ differ with the individual. Likewise, some may more or less discard the Golden Dawn patterns altogether and get more out of other methods; Witchcraft, Shamanic practices, Zen Meditation, Tai Chi, to name just a few. The A\A\system must to some extent be adaptable to the varying types of aspirants while maintaining its core framework and conceptual structures.

It should be clear from this that the A\A\ is not a one-size-fits-all system. But it is a system, and if people don’t like it there are others just as good, that might better suit them. The A\A\ is when finally considered, rooted in the Western esoteric traditions, with and injection of Eastern methods in the form of Yoga and Advaita, opening up possibilities in other areas of oriental thought. Despite this flexibility it does have to have a structure and a method by which training is conducted and progress assessed if it is to have any meaning.

My approach may best be described as this: The A\A\ system has set tasks laid out in the Oath papers and in One Star in Sight, and those tasks can be tested practically. For example, if I want to be sure a student has memorized their verse of Liber LXV, I have them recite it to me. If I want to test their astral vision, I devise a practical test for that. For Asana, I don’t really care which posture they have chosen, only that they can be ‘steady and easy’ for one hour in that posture. I set benchmarks, and ensure that the student knows what these are, but I don’t really mind how they get there. For example, I completed by Zelator 2=9 training due to my practice of Aikido, a form it has to be said that contains many concepts incorporated from Raja Yoga which was already tested practically in the dojo over years and afforded a high degree of mind/body unification. This essentially fulfilled the basic requirements of a firm foundation required in the grade of Yesod. The Asana test was relatively easy after all that, and my supervisor at the time, herself a martial artist, understood what I was doing and accepted it as meeting the spirit and technical requirements of the grade, despite not being literally included in Crowley’s system.

There is another form of assessing students, but this is not so much the formal testing of abilities, but of observing the students attitudes, thinking, way of living in the world, their whole way of being. But this is a difficult matter to discuss generally, and really depedns on interacting with, and getting to know them as people and as initiates, to give an indication of exactly where they stand in Tree of Life. But this is a whole topic in itself.

However, as a teaching system we must have a standard of measurement, a continuity, and we cannot expect to teach what we ourselves have not learned. Therefore, the A\A\ cannot be simply a free-for-all but a certain amount of measurable testing is necessary. Written, verbal and practical testing must ensure that aspirants have absorbed the essentials of the system, the framework so to speak, which means they can accurately transmit the same to any students they may have with minimal distortion. But at the same time, we must develop a methodology both flexible and adaptable enough to grow and develop, while also being rigid enough to add much needed structure and coherence to the Great Work. If we were to just do whatever we liked and casually set our own standards there would be no point continuing In the A\A\ as a system. In fact, it wouldn’t be a system at all, and would dissolve into meaninglessness, and empty form with no substance.

So, we must preserve the essential system of the A\A\, its basic texts and traditions, its Thelemic outlook and spirit as a vehicle of initiation in the New Aeon. While at the same time recognising that not only does knowledge advance; we have better sources than Crowley for Yoga for example, and there are multiple translation and interpretations of magick and occultism that were not available 100 years ago. We don’t want to preserve the Order as a museum piece, a sort of play acting of Victorian ceremonial magick, but a living tradition with feet firmly grounded in the reality of our lives, root that go much deeper. But also, with eyes that see, ears that hear, a mind that thinks, and the institutional adaptability to take on new knowledge, take advantage of advances in scholarship, science, knowledge generally. And this while adhering to the fundamental spirit of the A\A\ as a vehicle for the training of adepts able to actively and intelligently, in their own particular sphere, participate in the service of Humanity which is the final reason for the Orders existence.

Love is the law, love under will.

Pertinax

 

 

No comments:

Post a Comment